Profile information
| Employer | |
| Job Title | |
| Location | |
| Stakeholder groups |
Learning provider (Adult Safeguarded Learning), Learning provider (E2E), Learning provider (Employer Responsive), Learning provider (Train to Gain) |
sykdavet - made redundant on 19th November 2010's Latest Activity See All ››
-
sykdavet posted on the forum topic Change request 32 – Move to single ILR return in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area: 1 year, 5 months ago
Moe,
The LIS doesn't let the file validation errors through so when I load the batchfile all I see is warnings.It seems the main problem with a single ILR return is differences in the way we are paid and what happens if oyu have errors.
So, for the colleges, stop rejecting the uploaded file if it has [...] -
sykdavet posted on the forum topic Change request 32 – Move to single ILR return in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area: 1 year, 5 months ago
We are mainly ESF using the SR monthly returns.
The first thing to note is that an error doesn't reject the return, it goes into the exception list and you don't get paid for it until you fix it.
The second thing is that profile payments are vile, it is impossible to work out exactly where you [...] -
sykdavet joined the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area 1 year, 5 months ago
-
sykdavet posted on the forum topic Change request 32 – Move to single ILR return in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area: 1 year, 5 months ago
We are not a college, and we like monthly data returns!
We get paid based on those monthly returns!I am one of the 27 who responded.
I don't mind a single ILR return but it has to let us do it monthly.