<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pmudd - Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/activity/feed</link>
	<description>pmudd - Activity Feed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		
						<item>
				<guid>ec980c54b9235032abac98464a36e628</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[pmudd posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning under 9 GLH in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/">pmudd</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/foundation-learning-under-9-glh">Foundation Learning under 9 GLH</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I believe the 9 GLH still applies for 16-18, but I am not familiar with Foundation Learning.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>afc32c48384395cab73abe74151ebcb7</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[pmudd commented on the blog post Consultation on corrections to field H18]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-information-authority-secretariat-blog/consultation-h18/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:58:24 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/">pmudd</a> commented on the blog post <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-information-authority-secretariat-blog/consultation-h18/#comment-139">Consultation on corrections to field H18</a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>We use neither of these values in any case. So no problem for us.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>8fefd9a2a4d0d2cbccef37b1f0ac26cd</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[pmudd commented on the blog post Data Service Data Collections - Strategic Replacement Program]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-data-service/strategic-replacement-program/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:33:01 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/">pmudd</a> commented on the blog post <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-data-service/strategic-replacement-program/#comment-138">Data Service Data Collections - Strategic Replacement Program</a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I can only rememebr using PIMS once and then it re-directed me to Edubase? So I am not clear as to the purpose here. OLDC seems to have fulfilled its purpose. POL and IPOL mean nothing to me. The LIS has been absolutely vital to colleges (as well as being the bane of our lives!) [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>40bb3131b53659f984e7e01c73aba250</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[pmudd joined the group Individualised Learner Records: Data Issues]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/using-feconnect-about-these-forums</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:54:15 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/">pmudd</a> joined the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Individualised Learner Records: Data Issues</a>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>8ada545dd6b66ef0d52ad1639affd0d4</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[pmudd posted on the forum topic Official Guidance Discussion in the group Individualised Learner Records: Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/using-feconnect-about-these-forums</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:54:15 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/pmudd/">pmudd</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/official-guidance-discussion/">Official Guidance Discussion</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Individualised Learner Records: Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>My main concerns are around the idea that we can always be firm about qualification aim within the "funding start period" and the penalties in terms funding  for "unlisted" qualification aims. I have already sent the IA a detailed breakdown of the problems as I see them, but essentially they concern: key/functional skills, Skills [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>

