<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>peterw - Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/activity/feed</link>
	<description>peterw - Activity Feed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		
						<item>
				<guid>86416b29d13872c5653939a177f76323</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Delivery Location Postcode in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/delivery-location-postcode">Delivery Location Postcode</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Thanks.<br />
As the Programme Aim (ZPROG001) is not actually a qualification and is not actually delivered, I wondered why the Postcode is required here anyway.<br />
However, since posting I have found an answer to the same query from the Data Service from 2009.<br />
>><br />
Programme aim<br />
The delivery location postcode at the start of the programme should be recorded for [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>3fadbb0b9da27ef92fde0f77725838f6</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic Delivery Location Postcode in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:53:45 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/delivery-location-postcode">Delivery Location Postcode</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>For ER 'Programme Aim' what should the Delivery Postcode be ? ( previously field A23)<br />
The Employer's Postcode where the NVQ is delivered or the College's Postcode, where the technical certificate is delivered, or the Provider's postcode if different to above ?</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>b6079b225f6d9cb8ada0cb92921616e0</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Apprenticeship Framework Requests in the group Data Burden Project:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/data-burden-project</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:16:39 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/data-burden-project/forum/topic/apprenticeship-framework-requests">Apprenticeship Framework Requests</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/data-burden-project">Data Burden Project</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>ACE – comming soon</p>
<p>http://www.sscalliance.org/Home-Public/NewsandEvents/NewsandEventArticles/ApprenticeshipCertificatesEnglandACEiscomingJanuary2012.aspx</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>60fefb060cef958f09693de9f20d5458</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic Employer Data Registration Service (EDRS) in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:44:32 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/employer-data-registration-service-edrs">Employer Data Registration Service (EDRS)</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>The Employer Statisfaction Survey 2011/12 request that we update our employers' details, including an EDRS number on the FFE site. ( but doesn't actually say where the site is )<br />
http://readingroom.skillsfundingagency.bis.gov.uk/sfa/sfa-employersatisfactionsurvey201112-publicpaper-v1.pdf</p>
<p>Currently, we only need to obtain an EDRS number at the start of an apprentices training, so if they have changed employers, the new employer may [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>bb8ae37207cc9d725c45916037ca4f70</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic EMPLOYER RESPONSIVE - CHANGE OF SLN VALUE in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:28:49 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/employer-responsive-change-of-sln-value">EMPLOYER RESPONSIVE - CHANGE OF SLN VALUE</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I was expecting that any changes to SLN or Programme Weighting values  in LARA would be listed on the Data Amendments pages, but this hasn't been updated since July.<br />
We are not going to troll through LARA each week to see if there are any changes. The first we will know of a [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>d53d1460961a16163b94e84b7d6015ff</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Proportion of funding for nested Apprenticeships in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/proportion-of-funding-for-nested-apprenticeships">Proportion of funding for nested Apprenticeships</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Does this apply to SFA funding for Apprenticeships ? – Probably<br />
But as all our funding is from the SFA – I await information from them.</p>
<p>Its great to know that the funding for some courses may have been reduced by about 25%, 5 months after agreements have been signed etc. and learners have started their courses [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>ce7a76eb34259402c43d62a4a374bc6a</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:15:51 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I now have an accurate PFR.  </p>
<p>The records just needed to be recalculated to place the Framework completions in the correct month after the OLDC update a couple of weeks ago. Amending my data slightly caused a recalc of that record and now every thing seems fine.<br />
I still think it would be handy to [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>6a941471937ea92158d4b658bec22a29</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I requested a PFR on Friday, which was run Friday Night – still not showing Framework Achievement Payments for Last year and still using incorrect SLN values in a few cases for new starts</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>a52356cadbf0d868791800f1965f1718</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:08:38 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>As at 5th December, still no change to Framework Outcome payment dates on PFR. Still paid in month of NVQ completion, not Framework Claim date.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>03ddf9de85f542beb7f4ae411378ba08</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic ILR Change Request 8 – Improving the availability and collection of data on the economic activity st in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/ilr-change-request-8-%e2%80%93-improving-the-availability-and-collection-of-data-on-the-economic-activity-status-of-fe-learners">ILR Change Request 8 – Improving the availability and collection of data on the economic activity st</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Question 1. Would it be possible for the SFA to actually publish the exact questions to be asked so they could be included in our 'enrolment' paperwork.<br />
For Apprentices, would the period of 1 week be relevant, as a lot of apprentices are taken on after leaving school in June/July, but do not start their [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>c8609d7c240088634b5afd15d7bf14ec</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:39:32 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Although no longer a problem on LIS, the PFRs are still not showing the Achievement Funding in the correct month. Possibly because the Framework Achievement date isn't shown on the PFR, so the Achievement funding is being listed in the month teh main aim was completed.</p>
<p>Anyone know the reason why the Framework Achievement date was [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>11230b000cae0e70e695707aad404c22</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR Accuracy for 2011-12 in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area/forum/topic/pfr-accuracy-for-2011-12">PFR Accuracy for 2011-12</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area">2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Looks like they've corrected the Fwk Problem on LIS with Maintenance Release 2 (19.01.61). </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>32cda9709c53cee98c85fff08dcfe27a</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR Accuracy for 2011-12 in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area/forum/topic/pfr-accuracy-for-2011-12">PFR Accuracy for 2011-12</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201112-ilr-discussion-area">2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>As previously mentioned, unless it has been corrected, the Achievement funding on LIS and the PFR ( at least for Err App ) appears in the month the Main Aim was completed, whereas it should, I believe, appear in the month the Framework was claimed from the Awarding Body.  (I cant see why SFA [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>cc5e8047330aa602cb59fac1b86b0fb6</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:11:07 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>This problem seems to have been going on for a while.<br />
Current LIS Know Issue :<br />
1.11/ Apprenticeship Achievement is not calculated where main aims are<br />
achieved in the previous academic year.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>fcfddeb9a29aac64a25144a39d1fb0d1</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:32:53 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/pfr-and-lis-claiming-framework-achievement">PFR AND LIS - CLAIMING FRAMEWORK ACHIEVEMENT</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>For ER Apprenticeships<br />
The PFRs for 2011-12 show the Framework Achievement payment being paid in the that month the Main Aim was completed.  This means, that for those who completed their Main Aim in 2010-2011, the Achievement payment, claimed in 2011-12 is not being paid at all.</p>
<p>I believe this is a known issue with [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>65c132f3f722f686ade0549abbdea6a5</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic LARA 11/12 - Funding Values in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:55:25 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/lara-1112-funding-values">LARA 11/12 - Funding Values</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>On rechecking the SLN values for a qualification, I noticed that the start date on the Second funding line had been put back to October.  This means that for August and September we will now receive the Primary and lower rate of funding then previously expected.  </p>
<p>It would be nice ,<br />
a) if [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>cad7bdf4eae8e10d0bddd61bb1cdb185</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic 2012/13 XML FIles in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:31:09 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/201213-xml-files">2012/13 XML FIles</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>In the presentation 'Summary of changes to the ILR for 2012/13 Version 1 – 07 October 2011' ( published today)  there is the following statement:<br />
“There will be no flat file ILR specification for 2012/13 and no conversion facility available in the LIS. All ILR returns for 2012/13 must conform to the<br />
single ILR specification [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>69f5a0c627dabd14ad5b7cf87346d6f2</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Problem recording 2nd Technical Certificates in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/problem-recording-2nd-technical-certificates">Problem recording 2nd Technical Certificates</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>This now seems to have been resolved – at least in LIS</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>3ea444a44d6c482cafdad9b58bbfcf68</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic Removal of Low Value Fields in the group 2012/13 ILR Change Discussion:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion/forum/topic/removal-of-low-value-fields">Removal of Low Value Fields</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion">2012/13 ILR Change Discussion</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Not sure what is ment by a low value field, but from my point of view it would be any field which isn't used to calculate funding. Fields purely used to provide statistical information could be collected seperately by those who want it.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>a74506db63ced01410f7ed1a1acd1676</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic Problem recording 2nd Technical Certificates in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:13:52 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/problem-recording-2nd-technical-certificates">Problem recording 2nd Technical Certificates</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>For Apprentices, where a learner starts the NVQ 3 and 1st Technical certificate  of a Framework in September 2009, but does not start the 2nd Technical Certificate until September 2011 and where there is a new SASE Framework now replacing their old one, LIS is rejecting the 2nd Technical certificate, as the Framework is [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>0d8e5e1611e892a76e3370e80ca0f7a2</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Apprenticehips - Self Employed in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/apprenticehips-self-employed">Apprenticehips - Self Employed</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>According to Construction Skills, 40% of those employed in the Construction Industry in the South East are self employed. Thus they will no longer be able to pass their skills on to a trainee as they are unlikely to start a PAYE scheme just for one apprentice.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>753d346ee7203116bd590ac850806cee</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw commented on the blog post LARA Release 1 goes live]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-data-service/lara/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:34:24 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> commented on the blog post <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-data-service/lara/#comment-168">LARA Release 1 goes live</a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Will there a LARA “data amendments” excel file in the near future ?<br />
We have noticed that some SLNs have changed quite dramatically.<br />
There were over 800 changes on 3rd August ( presumably not all SLN changes )</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>7ef4bec3d8322aefd94d5060f3adc12f</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw posted on the forum topic Short Field names (Change Request #2) in the group 2012/13 ILR Change Discussion:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:22:53 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion/forum/topic/short-field-names-change-request-2">Short Field names (Change Request #2)</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion">2012/13 ILR Change Discussion</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>We must move with the times, but some of us small providers will either still be using POL, until July 2012, or will be submitting flat files via LIS. We do not have the staff with the expertise to create XML files from our own MI systems. ( or dont want the additional cost of [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>066cc0b6f0f711c05d8a150a7113a6c5</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw joined the group 2012/13 ILR Change Discussion]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> joined the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/201213-ilr-change-discussion">2012/13 ILR Change Discussion</a> <span class="time-since"></span>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>13284afdae1742c958e986085296cf3d</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[peterw started the forum topic Flat File Sequencing in the group Data Issues:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/peterw/">peterw</a> started the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues/forum/topic/flat-file-sequencing">Flat File Sequencing</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-records-data-issues">Data Issues</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>Is they any order in which the Programme, Main and Sub Aims should be sorted and given sequence numbers ( A05 ), especially where there are two Programme Aims ( one open and one closed ) and the associated NVQ, Tech Cert and 2x Key skills with each one ? </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>

