<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ken Moore - Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/activity/feed</link>
	<description>Ken Moore - Activity Feed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		
						<item>
				<guid>442a7e7755cc2e9de53a76cfaf0b03d1</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[Ken Moore posted on the forum topic Moving Prior Attainment to the aim level in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-record-200910-ilr-change-discussion</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:35:26 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a> posted on the forum topic <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-record-200910-ilr-change-discussion/forum/topic/moving-prior-attainment-to-the-aim-level">Moving Prior Attainment to the aim level</a> in the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-record-200910-ilr-change-discussion">2010/11 ILR Change Discussion</a>: <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>We are constantly told by the Data Service and the Information Authority that Prior Attaimnment (L35) is the learners attainment status at the point at which they join the institution and should not be changed year on year to reflect the learner's achievments at the college. If this is to remain the case what benefit [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>e8f0e1afc2cfec4fd893a48847d7d8b2</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[Ken Moore joined the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-record-200910-ilr-change-discussion</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:24:54 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a> joined the group <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/groups/individualised-learner-record-200910-ilr-change-discussion">2010/11 ILR Change Discussion</a> <span class="time-since"></span>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>6cde13d824da5abdabca27798312fa24</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[Ken Moore commented on the blog post An update from the information authority secretariat…]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-information-authority-secretariat-blog/090310/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:20:56 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a> commented on the blog post <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/the-information-authority-secretariat-blog/090310/#comment-44">An update from the information authority secretariat…</a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I echo Pauls comments and add </p>
<p>Is this intended as a fishing trip for 2010/11 to collect data to support funding rates changes for 2011/12 or a new funding rate / rule to be implemented in 2010/11. </p>
<p>If it is the latter the SFA need to<br />
    advise colleges if this change [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>3285fa00cf85f26b168a7b3d533a731e</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[Ken Moore commented on the blog post Proposed Employer Contributions Collection]]></title>
				<link>http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/secretariat-blog/proposed-employer-contributions-collection/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:39:55 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a> commented on the blog post <a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/blog/secretariat-blog/proposed-employer-contributions-collection/#comment-28">Proposed Employer Contributions Collection</a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote><p>I too am concerned by ‘in kind’, this will be and additional cost/staffing burden to collect and validate. It will have to be validated as we the providers will be responsible at audit.  If this gets imposed on us it will need to be supported by clear, unambiguous rules which are issued well before [...]</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>09ef24efd988e2f9fb26ef8fee4b4104</guid>
				<title><![CDATA[Ken Moore became a registered member]]></title>
				<link><a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a></link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:39:51 +0000</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://forums.theia.org.uk/members/kenmoore/">Ken Moore</a> became a registered member <span class="time-since"></span>]]></description>
						</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>

