break
active 2 months, 2 weeks ago

Jon.Eaton's Latest Activity See All ››

  • Avatar

    Jon.Eaton started the forum topic A51a Proportion of funding with the new EDEXCEL rates in the group Data Issues:   1 year, 2 months ago

    Morning
    I am looking for official advice from the IA on the following:

    I have a query with regards to the recent announcement from the YPLA & EDEXCEL with regards to the recent rate increases for the BTEC L2 Diplomas and BTEC L3 Subsidiary diplomas and the fact that the funding rates have gone up from 360 [...]

  • Avatar

    Jon.Eaton started the forum topic A11a_A11b_A70_2 Validation Rule in the group Data Issues:   1 year, 4 months ago

    Morning

    Could someone please help me with the above.

    I have now coded my 16-18 year olds with the following;
    A10 = '21' A11= '107' and A70= 'YPSW'

    But LIS18.02 does not like this as it is still recognising 107 as a Local Authority Code and wants A70 to start with 'LA*'

    The validation rules have been updated on [...]

  • Avatar

    Jon.Eaton posted on the forum topic Aims with no funding in the group Data Issues:   1 year, 4 months ago

    We have

    50045362 – No Funding details
    50069196 – 19+ rate only
    50076607 – No Funding Details
    5009001X – 19+ rate only
    50093174 – 19+ rate only

    regards

    Jon

  • Avatar

    Jon.Eaton posted on the forum topic A04_A14_A69_AD04_1 rule and A69 conflict in the group Data Issues:   1 year, 5 months ago

    Hi Anita

    Many thanks for getting back to me on this with an answer.

    Can you please tell me the date that the data service (the online data collection portal) will switch to using LIS 18.02.

    The thing is that obviously the ER01 & the F04 have deadlines on the same day (6th Sept). This deadline also happens [...]

  • Avatar

    Jon.Eaton posted on the forum topic A04_A14_A69_AD04_1 rule and A69 conflict in the group Data Issues:   1 year, 5 months ago

    Can someone from the IA please advise about this issue as we have still had no official guidance on this yet? Is it ok to ignore the ILR spec for A69 and set these learners to A69=2 to get them the correct funding and get past the validation?

Jon.Eaton's Groups (4) See All ››

break
break
break