Anita - Activity

Anita joined the group Data Service Software

Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:24:00 +0100

Anita joined the group Data Service Software

Anita posted on the forum topic DSAT 100-03-205 16-18 year old learners with no full funding or co-funding in the group Data Service Software:

Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:24:00 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic DSAT 100-03-205 16-18 year old learners with no full funding or co-funding in the group Data Service Software:

Hi James

You can leave the learners coded as 09. We will contact colleagues responsible for DSAT to request that this is changed.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic A04_A14_A69_AD04_1 rule and A69 conflict in the group Data Issues:

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:22:20 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic A04_A14_A69_AD04_1 rule and A69 conflict in the group Data Issues:

Jon

Validation rule A04_A14_A69_AD04_1 has been removed in LIS 18.02, which will be released soon.

A69 should be set to 99 for learners who started on a programme aged 16 – 18 but turned 19 during the programme.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:57:13 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Hi Alan

Please ignore my last post. The issue seems to be with the first link in Selvy's post. Please try the following link which should go straight into the consultation for change request 3:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/201112-change-request-3

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:31:47 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Hi Alan

Thanks for your feedback, which will be taken into account when considering this change request.

The consultation for Change Request 3 has dropped down on to the second page in Survey Monkey so you can access it by clicking on the page 2 link in the bottom right hand corner of the web page. [...]

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:34:45 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Unfunded provision would not count towards the provider success rates.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:21:11 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Thanks for your comments.

The request is to collect data on Apprenticeship provision only. This is to allow NAS to have a more complete picture of Apprenticeship delivery as a whole.

Regards

Anita

Anita joined the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:46:07 +0100

Anita joined the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:46:07 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Change request 3 – Unfunded employer responsive provision in the group 2011/12 ILR – Discussion Area:

Hi Alan

Yes, NAS would like data to be returned for any Apprenticeship provision that is delivered, whether funded by the Skills Funding Agency or not, so these learners would be included.

We welcome your comments on this.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic A66 & A67 for 10-11 in the group Data Issues:

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:13:44 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic A66 & A67 for 10-11 in the group Data Issues:

Jon / Alan

There does appear to be a conflict between the validation for fields A66 and A67 so we will work on a resolution for this issue. In the meantime, as you say, you will need to use code 98 in A67.

A66 must be completed for all ER learning aims (except the programme aim) [...]

Anita posted on the forum topic End Year Funding Claim Estimates in the group Data Issues:

Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:55:19 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic End Year Funding Claim Estimates in the group Data Issues:

Thanks for the link John. Looks like I'm having senior moments too …

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic End Year Funding Claim Estimates in the group Data Issues:

Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:49:58 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic End Year Funding Claim Estimates in the group Data Issues:

Hi Jonathan

I think Skills Funding Agency Guidance Note 5 will probably answer your query. It is available at:

http://skillsfundingagency.bis.gov.uk/providers/allthelatest/guidancenotes/

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning funding in the group Data Issues:

Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:14:15 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning funding in the group Data Issues:

Hi Alan

Entitlement will be triggered at the point where the learner is registered on qualifications which have a total planned glh of 336 or more.

If this is not the case then the learner is not full time and is therefore not eligible for entitlement funding.

When the point for entitlement is reached you should [...]

Anita posted on the forum topic 2010-11 Validation Rule A28-3 in the group Data Issues:

Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:15:11 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic 2010-11 Validation Rule A28-3 in the group Data Issues:

Hi Peter

Validation rule A28_3 is a warning only.

For migration of data from 2009/10 to 2010/11, we are not migrating recordswhere the Learning planned end date (A28) is before 1 August 2007.

Regards

Anita

Anita and sharonking are now friends

Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:10:39 +0100

Anita and sharonking are now friends

Anita posted on the forum topic Official Guidance Discussion in the group Data Issues:

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:29:02 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Official Guidance Discussion in the group Data Issues:

Jackie

I think the example given in Data Management FAQ 9 would also apply in this situation:

"For example, if a teaching session had to be cancelled due to tutor absence, then the planned GLH would not need to be amended."

Regards

Anita

Anita joined the group MIAP

Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:04:19 +0100

Anita joined the group MIAP

Anita posted on the forum topic Multiple ULN's for one person. in the group MIAP:

Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:04:19 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Multiple ULN's for one person. in the group MIAP:

Simon

In 2010/11 the validation for ASL funded learners will be a warning only.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning batch returns in the group Data Issues:

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:25:00 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning batch returns in the group Data Issues:

Paul

I am checking this with policy colleagues but my understanding is that Foundation Learning should be recorded as Progression Pathways in 2009/10 so the guidance in the Learner Responsive provider support manual for recording Progression Pathways would apply.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning batch returns in the group Data Issues:

Thu, 27 May 2010 15:09:38 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning batch returns in the group Data Issues:

Alan

We have now published guidance on recording Foundation Learning in the ILR for 2010/11 which you may find useful. This is available on our website at http://www.theia.org.uk/downloads/ilrdocuments/201011_guidance.htm.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning Programmes - Extending in the group Data Issues:

Thu, 27 May 2010 15:06:37 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Foundation Learning Programmes - Extending in the group Data Issues:

All

We have now published guidance on recording Foundation Learning in the ILR which is available on our website at http://www.theia.org.uk/downloads/ilrdocuments/201011_guidance.htm.

We will also be updating the ILR Specification for 2010/11 to include this guidance in Version 3 due to be published soon.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Skills Training Conditionality Pilot in the group Data Issues:

Mon, 17 May 2010 15:40:13 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Skills Training Conditionality Pilot in the group Data Issues:

Hi Paul

There are no plans at present to incorporate codings in the ILR to identify learners in the Skills Conditionality pilot as it should be possible to match ILR data to JCP data for this purpose.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:06:59 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

This time I really do have good news …

The Privacy Statement 2010/11 has now been published at: http://www.theia.org.uk/downloads/ilrdocuments/201011_ilrdetail.htm

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:48:28 +0100

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

All

Good news - we are told that the Data Protection Statement is on its way. We should be in a position to publish the statement tomorrow but I will let you know if there is any delay.

Regards

Anita

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:47:26 +0000

Anita posted on the forum topic Appendix F – Data Protection Statement in the group 2010/11 ILR Change Discussion:

Hi Steve

No news as yet I'm afraid. The statement wording has been drafted but it's awaiting final approval. Sorry, I know it's frustrating but as soon as we have the go ahead we'll publish Appendix F.

Regards

Anita