In addition to the benefits that Roland and John have already mentioned, some respondents to our online survey on this change suggest that xml files are easier to manage and are more portable / compatible with other software.
Thus far we’ve had 20 responses to our survey on this change. Of those, 55% are supportive of moving to xml, 20% are not and the remaining 25% are unsure. There seems to be a split between respondents on this change – people seem to think either that a move to xml is long overdue or that flat files work fine so there is no point in changing. Some have suggested that there is a lack of knowledge across the sector when it comes to xml.
We also asked what barriers people can see. The main issue there seems to be the costs associated with changing provider / collection systems.
Just a reminder that you can add your thoughts by responding in this forum, emailing us at cst@theia.org.uk or completing our survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/201112-change-request-33
Many thanks
Paul Kelman
The information authority